|
Why The Guardian Alert® Uses Doppler Microwave Technology
There are various types of
systems in consideration for discriminatory back up warning for trucks and
automobiles. These systems must alert the driver/vehicle operator to potential
collision situations while the vehicle is reversing. These are NOT back-up alarms that simply beep when a vehicle so equipped is in reverse; these are systems that warn a driver ONLY when necessary to avoid a collision.
Despite the best efforts of fleet operators and the common sense of private vehicle drivers, reversing incidents are all too common; there are about 500 fatalities each year, mostly young children. Vehicles with large blind spots to the rear, especially SUVs and vans, are becoming more prevalent in cities and suburban environments where reversing in constricted space is normal practice. The need for a technological solution to this dangerous situation has brought a number of, in our view, inadequate systems to market, some of which offer the illusion of solving the problem while only helping in marginal fashion under ideal circumstances.
As if reversing is not dangerous enough, the false sense of security that these systems give many drivers cause more accidents and in some cases more reckless reversing than with no system at all. Technology must provide a solution without adding false expectation. Currently, there are systems on the road with "holes" large enough for an adult to pass unnoticed and be run over during reversing. Other systems suffer chronic weather-related
performance restrictions and need regular maintenance that is obviously not going to happen in the real world.
However, Doppler microwave radar offers excellent performance in all environments, is maintenance-free and is affordable. Also, as an additional incentive to automakers and vehicle owners, it is unobtrusive to vehicle styling as it can be hidden behind the rear bumper skin.
Sense Technologies, Inc. has drawn the conclusion that Doppler microwave radar is the only system that offers complete coverage to the rear of the vehicle without compromising detection in any way that allows people to go undetected. Additionally, it senses only diminishing distance between the vehicle and any object, because without the distance between the vehicle and object diminishing, a collision cannot occur. This is an important means by which nuisance notifications are reduced.
As a further means to reduce nuisance notifications, The Guardian AlertŪ also does not warn if the
diminishing distance closing speed is under one-quarter of one mile-per-hour.This is because normal
backing scenarios contemplate a backing speed of well over that rate, and if a backing speed is under that rate, it is most likely because the operator is aware of an obstruction and "inching" toward it. This is an important distinction of the Guardian AlertŪ as a "near unknown-objects detection sensor" as opposed to "parking aids".
There are four basic areas of compromise with various back-up warning systems:
- Environmental issues
- Passive warning
- Presence sensing
- Vibration and durability issue
While each is a separate limitation, most systems suffer from more than one.
Environmental Issues cover a whole range of problems from
precipitation to illumination levels, with condensation and road dirt causing
the most and worst system failures and performance degradation.
Cameras and monitor systems, being optical in nature, often do not work well without sufficient light levels. Ice, dirt and condensation may render these systems totally useless. Condensation is a particular issue during early morning operation, and heaters are sometimes used to offset this issue. While some immediate maintenance may improve some situations, heavy precipitation may severely hinder their ability to detect or warn the vehicle operator of an obstacle in the path of a reverse-moving vehicle.
Infrared ranging systems suffer
the same as cameras; optics get dirty and don't work. Cleaning without
sufficient water causes scratches that over time further degrade performance.
Ultrasonic systems do not work in
strong winds (over 12 mph) and suffer from the transducers "clogging up" with
damp road dirt and salt. A major problem attributable to ultrasonic sensor
systems having multiple transducers (currently the automakers are using such
systems) is that the transducers won't all clog up at once and fail totally. If
they did, the driver would stand some chance of realizing the system had
problems; however, they clog up randomly during forward motion (regular
driving). They fail to work (when called upon by engaging reverse) individually
or maybe in pairs, but not as a whole set. For example, a vehicle equipped with
the reverse sensing system suffers clogging (failure) in three sensors -
passenger side outer, passenger side inner and drivers side inner. The drivers
side outer is fine, and so when the vehicle is reversed back towards a flat
wall, the system reports it's warnings correctly, and the driver has no idea
that the system is suffering a 75% failure. Shortly thereafter, the driver
backs towards a supposedly open area, unaware of a child in the blind spot
behind the passenger side of the rear bumper. The three clogged transducers
fail to detect.therefore, no warnings are given. Afterwards, the driver insists that the system worked just fine a little while earlier, and general testing will substantiate that statement. However,
thorough testing will reveal the lack of detection on the passenger side. Ultrasonic sensors cannot self-test themselves individually. Such sensors either need to work in pairs looking at each other, or with a target behind the vehicle. Sensors that look at each other will false alarm in normal operation so they are either not arranged to see each other or are operated in a ripple (one at a time in sequence). Since the time of flight of a sound wave is slow, and the settling time of an inductive pulse circuit is long, this causes rapidly moving targets (over 5 mph) to go undetected before collision (see disclaimer #1, later).
Radar systems are unaffected by all known environmental conditions. The only exception is a metallic bumper-sticker, such as on a AAA bumper sticker (and obviously this limitation
can easily be avoided), as radar cannot see through metal.
Passive warning refers to the system's failure to alert the operator or driver to a dangerous condition while reversing. Camera and monitor systems do not beep or flash lights at the driver if a target enters the field of detection. If the driver is not looking (concentrating) on the image in the monitor, and/or if the driver is distracted by other vehicles or events and fails to see the target, a collision can occur. Active warning systems beep and flash lights. They do not need to be looked at to be effective because they are audible and visual.
Passive Warning systems (cameras) stick out of the rear of vehicles and look good to the general public who understand their function and see the fleet operator making an effort towards safety. They also gain favor with fleet operators because they make the entire decision-making process of the backing maneuver be that of the operator. There is no warning issued from the system for the driver to interpret. The operator must observe the situation (as best as can be done with the system performance and environmental conditions), make a judgment, and act accordingly. If he has an accident, it's the operator's fault not the owner's. From the owner's perspective, if the system doesn't work for whatever reason, it can be observed to be not working, and the operator should act accordingly (not reverse). If maintenance has failed to keep the system in good order, the operator can see this and abort the reverse maneuver. Fleet operators like "blame-free" systems that look good to the general public. Thus, many camera systems are installed despite their failings.
Presence Sensing systems (all ultrasonic and some radar) warn of
things that are there in the field of detection even if they will never, ever,
collide with the vehicle. They warn of targets that are stationary, relative to
the vehicle, or are moving away from the vehicle. So, if for example the ground
happened to be in the field of view, the system would continuously alarm. As a
result, such a system is configured not to see the ground. Then, due to
the possibility of a rearward up-ramp or incline (in a driveway for example),
the clearance between the lower detection edge of the ultrasonic beam or
presence sensing radar is increased to about 8-inches (a 6 degree up-ramp
requires 8-inches of clearance for a 6-foot detection system), and allowing for
road surface perturbations and vehicle height due to variances with loading,
this clearance is raised to about 10 inches. The result is that an average
200-pound adult lying face up would go undetected under the beam. Children who
have slipped on wet or icy pavement trying to get out of the way of backing
vehicles will go undetected.
The ultimate conclusion to this situation is that the automakers have stopped referring to these systems as "reverse warning systems" and are now called them "parking assist systems". They actively specify them as going no lower than the lowest part of the vehicle (such lowest part that is not wheel or tire-related) and no higher that the top of the rear bumper. Somewhere in the owner's manual this is explained, along with all the other disclaimers these systems require. As we all know, generally an owner's manual is not well read so it is reasonable to assume that most drivers will think that such a system provides full coverage or are unaware of it's limitations (see disclaimer #2, later). Either way, it offers no safety-related benefits to reversing towards an unseen person unless the person is standing up.
It should be noted that most
presence-sensing systems installed have an OFF button that overrides and
defeats the system. This is because while a vehicle is stationary, with something in the detection zone and being in reverse gear causes endless, annoying warnings. The OFF switch cancels these
annoying alarms and resets to normal operation the next time reverse gear is selected. This is to help limit the "nuisance" factor, but it does nothing to cause the operator to retain confidence in the reliability of the system to warn him/her when needed.
Vibrations and durability issues are very important. Sometimes, when parked and unattended, vehicles can be damaged by other vehicles, shopping carts, etc. Tree limbs can
brush the top rear edge of vans and trucks, car washing systems (especially dryers) can misalign cameras and mirrors. Cross view mirrors are bumped and put out of alignment by loading docks and other vehicles from the same fleet during off hour loading and parking.
The reliability of optical
(camera and mirror) systems is impaired by knocks and bumps that go undetected
until it's too late. Vehicle vibration as well as jolting from bumpy roads can
also cause misalignment if the mounting structure is not robust enough.
Ultrasonic and radar systems also suffer problems due to their exposure,
depending on mounting location; however, radar mounted behind the rear bumper is virtually indestructible unless a
serious collision causes the bumper to be smashed.All Sense Technologies
sensors are encased in an almost indestructible epoxy-type resin for long-term
durability.
Typical disclaimers and cautionary warnings of systems other than Guardian Alert® that we have discovered in owner's manuals, product literature, etc.:
|
Disclaimer #1 |
"To help avoid personal injury, please read and understand the limitations on the reverse sensing system described below. Reverse sensing is only an assist for some (generally large and fixed) objects when moving in reverse on a flat surface at "parking speeds" of approximately 6km/h (4 mph) or less. It is the driver's responsibility for ensuring that their path is clear when operating the vehicle."
|
|
Disclaimer #2 |
"To help avoid personal injury, always use caution when in reverse and when using the reverse sensing system."
|
|
Disclaimer #3 |
"This system is not designed to prevent contact with small or moving objects. The system is designed to provide a warning to assist the driver in detecting large stationary objects to avoid damaging the vehicle. The system may not detect smaller objects, particularly those close to the ground."
|
|
Disclaimer #4 |
"Always keep the sensors (located on the rear bumper/fascia) free from dirt, snow and ice (do not clean the sensors with sharp objects). These elements may cause the system to operate inaccurately."
|
Following is a review of key issues for most types of reverse warning systems:
| |
Camera & monitor |
Ultrasonic |
Presence radar |
Doppler radar |
|
Light levels |
Problem |
OK |
OK |
OK |
|
Dirt / mud |
Problem |
Problem |
OK |
OK |
|
Precipitation |
Problem |
OK |
OK |
OK |
|
Condensation |
Problem |
OK |
OK |
OK |
|
Active / passive |
Passive |
Active |
Active |
Active |
|
Bump / knock |
Problem |
Problem |
OK |
OK |
|
Coverage to pavement |
YES |
NO |
NO |
YES |
|